Your search
Results 2 resources
-
The organic component of the molluscan shell allows for orderly biomineralization and ensures structural integrity that is crucial to survival. This organic contribution to the shell typically composes 2-5% of the total adult shell by weight. Because macro- and microstructure of the shell is known to vary with ontogeny and across taxa, we examined if the organic to mineral ratio components in shell also varied with growth across taxa. To assess intraspecific differences in the organic to mineral ratio of the shell during growth, we examined ratios in three marine [Crepidula fornicata (Linnaeus, 1758), Littorina littorea (Linnaeus, 1758), and Littorina saxatilis (Olivi, 1792)] and two freshwater [Corbicula fluminea (Müller, 1774) and Bellamya chinensis (Gray, 1834)] mollusks across size ranges. In the marine gastropods, the average organic component by weight of the small size class was significantly larger than the average organic proportions of the medium and large size classes. The smallest size class of L. saxatilis had an average shell organic proportion of 11.12%, while the smallest size classes of C. fornicata (3.53%) and L. littorea (2.60%) had percentages below 5%. The smallest size class of C. fluminea had a greater average shell organic proportion than the largest size class (6.19% vs 2.68% organics). Adult specimens of B. chinensis had an average shell organic proportion of 3.93%, while in utero shelled juveniles had an average of 10.05%. In both freshwater and marine species, the smallest size class had a greater organic proportion. As the organic matrix is energetically more expensive than the calcified shell portion, we hypothesize that energy expended in these smaller (usually pre-reproductive maturity) stages of growth allows for a more rapid production of shell and that this “expense” is a valuable trade-off for the protection the shell offers young mollusks.
-
Freshwater unionid mussels produce a bilayered shell with the mineral proportion comprising an outer prismatic and an inner nacreous layer. The shell is the animals’ primary structural means of protection from predators and environmental challenges; therefore, variations in shell strength and properties may lead to differences in survival. Few studies have systematically assessed shell properties in unionids. A major challenge in such work is separating effects of environment from those of evolutionary history, because ultimately, both can affect shell properties. We collected eight species of unionids within a small area of the Allegheny River, Pennsylvania, that was relatively homogeneous in substratum type and other environmental characteristics. For each species, we quantified shell thickness, including thickness of the prismatic and nacreous layers, and shell micromechanical properties (microhardness and crack propagation, a measure of fracture resistance) in three regions of the shell. Shell thickness varied dramatically among species and was about five times greater in the thickest-shelled species, Pleurobema sintoxia, than in the thinnest-shelled species, Villosa iris. Because all species experienced similar environmental conditions, variation in shell thickness can be attributed largely to evolutionary history. In contrast, microhardness and crack propagation showed little variation among species. Given that micromechanical properties are similar among species, shell strength may be largely a function of thickness. These results have conservation implications, as differences in shell thickness could reflect relative vulnerability to predators and physical conditions
Explore
Resource type
- Journal Article (2)