Your search
Results 5 resources
-
This paper investigates a possibility of sustainable growth in a multi-output endogenous growth framework where the capital accumulation takes place mainly through the production of the dirty manufactured goods. It is shown that in a closed economy, economic growth is not environmentally sustainable, even under an optimal pollution tax unless the consumption elasticity of substitution between clean and dirty goods approaches infinity as in a small open economy which exports dirty goods. There exists a minimal threshold level of the ratio of clean to dirty capital that ensures sustainable growth in a closed economy.
-
Disruptive technological changes, including carbon capture and storage, can have macroeconomic rebound effects that pose a threat to long term environmental sustainability when not accompanied by pollution taxes. The paper demonstrates that when the elasticity of intertemporal substitution is less than one, implementing a Pigouvian tax effectively stabilizes pollution emissions, regardless of technical and consumption elasticities of substitution. However, if the elasticity of intertemporal substitution exceeds one, flexibility in technical or consumption substitution could cause sustainable growth to falter. The policy implications concerning the role of subsidies for clean technology are discussed.
-
The paper estimates the determinants of the growing volume of bilateral environmental aid for the mitigation of climate change using an empirically testable multilateral framework in which both donors and recipient countries compete in world export markets. As the potential donors weigh environmental benefits against the economic costs of providing aid, strategic interactions between the donors and the recipient countries as well as among the donors, influence the evolution of environmental aid. The paper shows that while the volume of bilateral environmental aid increases with the recipient country’s credible environmental commitment and bilateral trade volume, the competitive pressure in the export market reduces bilateral environmental aid. Free-riding incentives prevail among the individual donors, whereas the multilateral environmental aids that aim to restore the loss of global environmental resources without altering individual trade competitiveness can increase bilateral environmental aids.
-
Global climate-finance debates increasingly emphasize tensions between donor competitiveness and environmental responsibility. This paper examines how trade competition shapes the allocation of bilateral environmental official development assistance (BEODA). We develop a partial-equilibrium model showing that aid which lowers recipient production costs can intensify competitive pressure on donor markets, reducing incentives to provide such aid. Using data on 29 OECD donors and 116 non-OECD recipients from 2015–2019, we test whether donors adjust BEODA in response to trade competition. The analysis distinguishes between general BEODA and projects targeting energy efficiency, which more directly reduce marginal costs. Across linear, Tobit, and probit models with multiple fixed effects, we find that donors allocate less BEODA to more competitive recipients, with the effect nearly twice as strong for energy-saving projects. These results indicate that donor concerns over competitiveness constrain environmentally beneficial aid, underscoring a central tension between national economic interests and global climate goals. © 2026 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
-
This paper provides an empirical framework to assess the nonlinear complementary linkage effects that arise from the interaction between motorway capital and information and communications technology (ICT) capital in developed economies. Using panel data from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) member countries and controlling for endogeneity, the paper finds that there exists a critical mass for ICT capital such that if the capital grows beyond the critical mass, the marginal contribution of motorway capital to productivity growth increases as the motorway is extended. This empirical result explains variations in the productivity contributions of transport infrastructure across countries that differ in their ICT infrastructure and has implications for setting the investment priorities of key components of infrastructure. © 2019, © 2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
Explore
Resource type
- Journal Article (4)
- Preprint (1)
Publication year
-
Between 2000 and 2026
(5)
-
Between 2010 and 2019
(1)
- 2018 (1)
- Between 2020 and 2026 (4)
-
Between 2010 and 2019
(1)
Resource language
- English (4)