Full bibliography
A comparison of different investigative interviewing techniques in generating differential recall enhancement and detecting deception
Resource type
Authors/contributors
- De Rosa, Jacob (Author)
- Hiscockanisman, Cheryl (Author)
- Blythe, Adam (Author)
- Bogaard, Glynis (Author)
- Hally, Ashley (Author)
- Colwell, Kevin (Author)
Title
A comparison of different investigative interviewing techniques in generating differential recall enhancement and detecting deception
Abstract
This study compared the Stepwise Interview, Cognitive Interview, and Reality Interview in detecting deception with inmates. The dependent measures were the amount of unique details provided during the free narrative and mnemonics and the number of words provided during the free narrative and mnemonics of each interview. The Stepwise Interview generated 58.3% accuracy, the Cognitive Interview generated 70.0% accuracy, and the Reality Interview generated 93.3% accuracy. The different tasks of these interviews increased the differences between honest and deceptive statements and therefore, increased the accuracy in detection of deception. Differential recall enhancement is used to explain the findings.
Publication
Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling
Date
2019
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
44-58
DOI
Citation Key
pop00200
ISSN
1544-4759
Language
English
Extra
4 citations (Crossref) [2023-10-31]
Citation Key Alias: ISI:000459742000004, lens.org/168-236-602-671-439
tex.type: [object Object]
Citation
De Rosa, J., Hiscockanisman, C., Blythe, A., Bogaard, G., Hally, A., & Colwell, K. (2019). A comparison of different investigative interviewing techniques in generating differential recall enhancement and detecting deception. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 16(1), 44–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.1519
Link to this record