Full bibliography

Evolution of a Theory: How Measurement Has Shaped Ayres Sensory Integration®

Resource type
Authors/contributors
Title
Evolution of a Theory: How Measurement Has Shaped Ayres Sensory Integration®
Abstract
Scientific theory evolves through phases. Scientists observe phenomena, classify their observations, examine and explain causation, and attempt to understand their results in varied circumstances. If anomalies are found that do not mesh with the theory, revision occurs, and the theory is improved (Christensen, Carlile, & Sundahl, 2001). Each stage requires accurate and precise measurement and, therefore, appropriate measurement tools.The body of scientific inquiry developed by A. Jean Ayres is deeply rooted in systematic and methodical measurement, and her work marked the first effort by an occupational therapist to build a theory for clinical application with an evidence-based approach. The trajectory of the growth of Ayres Sensory Integration® (ASI), beginning in the 1950s with continual advancements from the ongoing contributions of the researchers who have built on her seminal work since that time, has occurred simultaneously with the widespread use of more rigorous research methods, attention to measurement of fidelity, greater usage of exploratory and factor analysis, and more routine practice of examining multivariate research problems with computer statistical programs (Century, Rudnick, & Freeman, 2010; Elmore & Woehlke, 1988; Keselman et al., 1998; Ottenbacher & Peterson, 1985; Press, 2013; Tukey, 1980; West, Carmody, & Stallings, 1983).
Publication
The American Journal of Occupational Therapy
Date
2014-09-01
Volume
68
Issue
5
Pages
495-499
Journal Abbr
The American Journal of Occupational Therapy
Citation Key
maillouxEvolutionTheoryHow2014
Accessed
5/16/24, 2:12 PM
ISSN
0272-9490
Short Title
Evolution of a Theory
Library Catalog
Silverchair
Citation
Mailloux, Z., & Miller-Kuhaneck, H. (2014). Evolution of a Theory: How Measurement Has Shaped Ayres Sensory Integration®. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 68(5), 495–499. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2014.013656