Full bibliography
Mathematical models and the experimental analysis of behaviour
Resource type
Author/contributor
- Mazur, James E (Author)
Title
Mathematical models and the experimental analysis of behaviour
Abstract
The rise of mathematical models in the experimental analysis of behavior has increased over the years, and they offer several advantages. Mathematical models require theorists to be precise and unambiguous, often allowing comparisons of competing theories that sound similar when stated in words. Sometimes different mathematical models may make equally accurate predictions for a large body of data. In Such cases, it is important to find and investigate situations for which the competing models make different predictions because, unless two models are actually mathematically equivalent, they are based on different assumptions about the psychological processes that underlie ail observed behavior. Mathematical models developed in basic behavioral research have been used to predict and control behavior in applied settings, and they have guided research in other areas of psychology. A good mathematical model call provide a common framework for understanding what might otherwise appear to be diverse and unrelated behavioral phenomena. Because psychologists vary in their quantitative skills and in their tolerance for mathematical equations, it is important for those who develop mathematical models of behavior to find ways (such as verbal analogies, pictorial representations, or concrete examples) to communicate the key premises of their models to nonspecialists.
Publication
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
Date
2006-03
Volume
85
Issue
2
Pages
275-291
Journal Abbr
J Exp Anal Behav
Citation Key
pop00047
ISSN
0022-5002
Language
English
Extra
81 citations (Crossref) [2023-10-31]
Citation Key Alias: lens.org/006-251-406-775-565
tex.type: [object Object]
Citation
Mazur, J. E. (2006). Mathematical models and the experimental analysis of behaviour. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 85(2), 275–291. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2006.65-05
Link to this record