Full bibliography
To forget or not to forget: The effect of probability of test on directed forgetting
Resource type
Authors/contributors
- Golding, JM (Author)
- Roper, KL (Author)
- Hauselt, J (Author)
Title
To forget or not to forget: The effect of probability of test on directed forgetting
Abstract
Two experiments investigated how individuals use explicit memory cues that designate different probabilities of test. As in typical directed forgetting studies, subjects received words explicitly cued as having either a 0% or a 100% chance of being on a subsequent memory test (i.e. forget and remember cues, respectively). In addition, some words were explicitly cued as having the potential to be either forgotten or remembered (i.e. a 50% cue). Recall of 50% words was between that of 0% and 100% words. In addition, the presence of 50% words lowered recall of the 100% words compared to that of a control group that did not receive the 50% words, but received the same number of 100% words. A think-aloud task indicated that these results were due to the 50% words being treated like either 100% or 0% words at encoding. The results are discussed in terms of the effect of different probabilities of test on the strategic processing and representation of information.
Publication
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section a-Human Experimental Psychology
Date
1996-05
Volume
49
Issue
2
Pages
326-340
Journal Abbr
Q. J. Exp. Psychol. Sect. A Hum. Exp. Psychol.
Citation Key
ISI:A1996UV09500004
ISSN
0272-4987
Language
English
Extra
3 citations (Crossref) [2023-10-31]
tex.orcid-numbers: Roper, Karen/0000-0002-7281-1713
tex.unique-id: ISI:A1996UV09500004
Citation Key: ISI:A1996UV09500004
Citation
Golding, J., Roper, K., & Hauselt, J. (1996). To forget or not to forget: The effect of probability of test on directed forgetting. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A-Human Experimental Psychology, 49(2), 326–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/027249896392667
Link to this record