Full bibliography

Beta-Test Data On An Assessment Of Textbook Problem Solving Ability: An Argument For Right∕Wrong Grading?

Resource type
Authors/contributors
Title
Beta-Test Data On An Assessment Of Textbook Problem Solving Ability: An Argument For Right∕Wrong Grading?
Abstract
We have developed an assessment of students' ability to solve standard textbook style problems and are currently engaged in the validation and revision process. The assessment covers the topics of force and motion, conservation of momentum and conservation of energy at a level consistent with most calculus-based, introductory physics courses. This tool is discussed in more detail in an accompanying paper by Marx and Cummings. [1] Here we present preliminary beta-test data collected at four schools during the 2009/2010 academic year. Data include both pre- and post-instruction results for introductory physics courses as well as results for physics majors in later years. In addition, we present evidence that right/wrong grading may well be a perfectly acceptable grading procedure for a course-level assessment of this type. © 2010 American Institute of Physics.
Proceedings Title
2010 Physics Education Research Conference
Conference Name
2010 PHYSICS EDUCATION RESEARCH CONFERENCE
Place
Portland, (Oregon)
Date
2010
Volume
1289
Pages
113-116
ISBN
0094243X (ISSN); 9780735408449 (ISBN)
Citation Key
cummingsBetaTestDataAssessment2010
Accessed
12/13/19, 8:59 PM
Short Title
Beta-Test Data On An Assessment Of Textbook Problem Solving Ability
Language
English
Library Catalog
DOI.org (Crossref)
Extra
2 citations (Crossref) [2023-10-31] Citation Key Alias: lens.org/136-768-475-813-84X, pop00255 tex.number: [object Object]
Citation
Cummings, K., Marx, J. D., Singh, C., Sabella, M., & Rebello, S. (2010). Beta-Test Data On An Assessment Of Textbook Problem Solving Ability: An Argument For Right∕Wrong Grading? 2010 Physics Education Research Conference, 1289, 113–116. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3515174