Full bibliography
A case for promoting movement medicine: preventing disability in the LIFE randomized controlled trial
Resource type
Authors/contributors
- Fanning, Jason (Author)
- Rejeski, W Jack (Author)
- Chen, Shyhhuei (Author)
- Nicklas, Barbara J (Author)
- Walkup, Michael P (Author)
- Axtell, Robert S (Author)
- Fielding, Roger A (Author)
- Glynn, Nancy W (Author)
- King, Abby C (Author)
- Manini, Todd M (Author)
- Mcdermott, Mary Mcgrae (Author)
- Newman, Anne B (Author)
- Pahor, Marco (Author)
- Tudorlocke, Catrine (Author)
- Miller, Michael I (Author)
Title
A case for promoting movement medicine: preventing disability in the LIFE randomized controlled trial
Abstract
Background: The movement profile of older adults with compromised function is unknown, as is the relationship between these profiles and the development of major mobility disability (MMD)-a critical clinical outcome. We first describe the dimensions of movement in older adults with compromised function and then examine whether these dimensions predict the onset of MMD. Methods: Older adults at risk for MMD (N = 1,022, mean age = 78.7 years) were randomized to receive a structured physical activity intervention or health education control. We assessed MMD in 6-month intervals (average follow-up of 2.2 years until incident MMD), with activity assessed at baseline, 6-, 12- and 24-month follow-up via accelerometry. Results: A principal components analysis of 11 accelerometer-derived metrics yielded three components representing lifestyle movement (LM), extended bouts of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA), and stationary body posture. LM accounted for the greatest proportion of variance in movement (53%). Within health education, both baseline LM (HR = 0.74; 95% CI 0.62 to 0.88) and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (HR = 0.69; 95% CI 0.54 to 0.87) were associated with MMD, whereas only LM was associated with MMD within physical activity (HR = 0.74; 95% CI 0.61 to 0.89). There were similar nonlinear relationships present for LM in both physical activity and health education (p ยก .04), whereby risk for MMD was lower among individuals with higher levels of LM. Conclusions: Both LM and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity should be central in treatment regimens for older adults at risk for MMD.
Publication
Journals of Gerontology Series A-biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
Date
2019
Volume
74
Issue
11
Pages
1821-1827
Citation Key
pop00036
ISSN
1079-5006
Language
English
Extra
8 citations (Crossref) [2023-10-31]
Citation Key Alias: ISI:000491242600017, lens.org/077-007-606-131-474
tex.type: [object Object]
Citation
Fanning, J., Rejeski, W. J., Chen, S., Nicklas, B. J., Walkup, M. P., Axtell, R. S., Fielding, R. A., Glynn, N. W., King, A. C., Manini, T. M., Mcdermott, M. M., Newman, A. B., Pahor, M., Tudorlocke, C., & Miller, M. I. (2019). A case for promoting movement medicine: preventing disability in the LIFE randomized controlled trial. Journals of Gerontology Series A-Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 74(11), 1821–1827. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glz050
Link to this record