Changing working environments in philosophy: reflections from a case study

Resource type
Authors/contributors
Title
Changing working environments in philosophy: reflections from a case study
Abstract
There is an “under-representation problem” in philosophy departments and journals. Empirical data suggest that while we have seen some improvements since the 1990s, the rate of change has slowed down. Some posit that philosophy has disciplinary norms making it uniquely resistant to change. We present results from an empirical case study of a philosophy department that achieved and maintained male-female gender parity among its faculty as early as 2014. Our analysis extends beyond matters of gender parity because that is only one, albeit important, dimension of inclusion. We build from the study to reflect on strategies that may catalyze change.
Publication
Philosophy of Science
Date
2025/03/19
Pages
1-36
Citation Key
mcconwellChangingWorkingEnvironments2025
Accessed
4/3/25, 2:45 PM
ISSN
0031-8248, 1539-767X
Short Title
Changing working environments in philosophy
Language
en
Library Catalog
Cambridge University Press
Citation
McConwell, A. K., Bogacz, M. T., Brecevic, C., Haber, M. H., Wu, J., & Roe, S. M. (2025). Changing working environments in philosophy: reflections from a case study. Philosophy of Science, 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1017/psa.2025.12