CEO archetype identity drives organization culture

Resource type
Authors/contributors
Title
CEO archetype identity drives organization culture
Abstract
In the current study the relationships between CEO archetypes and organizational climate were examined. Archetypes are historical, mythical, and cultural representations that are shared in our collective unconscious. Data were collected from a CEO and his employees, using a mixed methods research approach which involved the Zaltman Metaphorical Elicitation Technique (ZMET), as well as personality measures and quantitative assessments of organizational climate. The CEO archetype as perceived by employees is that of a benevolent patriarch which mirrors the CEO's self-concept as caring for the well-being of employees. Employees ascribed the stress-free and nurturing organizational climate to the CEO's archetypical leadership style. However, their organizational climate, in principle, leads to excessive employee familistic dependence on the CEO for making important organizational decisions and supplying creative ideation. The present study of a CEO archetype and its bearing on organizational climate is unique, filling an important gap in management knowledge. Implications of the study involve the channeling of its insights about the archetype-embedded organizational climate, so as to better select administrative managers, improve organizational communication trust and openness, stimulate creative innovation, handle organizational crises, and generally promote employee well-being. © 2019 University of Phoenix
Publication
Journal of Leadership Studies
Date
2019-07-29
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
62-67
Journal Abbr
J Ldrship Studies
Citation Key
princeCEOArchetypeIdentity2019
Accessed
10/2/19, 7:37 PM
ISSN
1935-2611, 1935-262X
Language
English
Library Catalog
DOI.org (Crossref)
Extra
3 citations (Crossref) [2023-10-31]
Citation
Prince, M., Forr, J., Wardlaw, J., & Plummer, J. (2019). CEO archetype identity drives organization culture. Journal of Leadership Studies, 13(3), 62–67. https://doi.org/10.1002/jls.21642